Bob Juch's Kin

Over 64,000 people

Banner - Ancestry.com
Search this site

Ancestors of Robert Erwin William Juch

Twenty-Sixth Generation


38158720. Jolian de Neville was born about 1187. He married Maud de Beauchamp. [Parents]

38158721. Maud de Beauchamp was born about 1191.

They had the following children:

19079360 M i Andrew de Neville was born about 1228.

38160384. Sir Ralph St. Leger 1 was born before 1271 in Ulcombe, Kent, England. [Parents]

He had the following children:

19080192 M i Bartholomew St. Leger was born about 1300.

38161414. William de Percy Lord Topcliffe is printed as #19080720.

38161415. Joan de Briwere was born 1187 in Stoke, Devonshire, England. [Parents]

They had the following children:

F i
Alice de Percy was born 1203.
F ii
Ada de Percy was born 1210 in Alnwick, Northumberland, England.
19080707 F iii Anastacia de Percy was born 1218.
F iv
Agnes de Percy was born in Alnwick, Northumberland, England.
F v
Joan de Percy.

38161432. Hugh de Mortimer Baron of Wigmore was born 1108 in Wigmore, Herefordshire, England. He died 26 Feb 1184 in Cleobury, Salopshire, England. Hugh married Maud de Meschines. [Parents]

38161433. Maud de Meschines was born about 1120 in Gernon Castle, Normandy, France. She died after 1190 in Skipton in Craven, England. [Parents]

They had the following children:

19080716 M i Roger de Mortimer was born about 1158 and died 24 Jun 1214.

38161434. Walkelin de Ferrers was born about 1010. He died 1089 in Saint Hillaire, Normandy, France. Walkelin married Alice Leche.

He was slain in the civil wars which distracted Normandy during the minority of Duke William, later William the Conqueror.

38161435. Alice Leche was born about 1015.

They had the following children:

M i
Henry de Ferrers 1st Earl Ferrers was born about 1040.

He is widely believed to have fought at the Battle of Hastings, 1066, as his name appears on various versions of the Battle Abbey Roll,
though it is impossible to be certain. He was a Domesday Commissioner, 1086, and held some 210 lordships and manors at the time of the Survey, mostly inco. Derby, by gift of William the Conqueror. Founded a priory of Benedictine monks near Tutbury, Staffs.

HENRY DE FERRERS
The Conqueror and His Companions
by J. R. Planché, Somerset Herald. London: Tinsley Brothers, 1874..

"Henri le Sire de Ferriers," commemorated by Wace as a combatant at Senlac, was Seigneur de Saint Hilaire de Ferriers, near Bernay, and son of Walkelin de Ferrers, who fell in a contest with the first Hugh de Montfort we hear of in the early days of Duke William II, and therefore, though a younger son, for he had an elder brother named Guillaume, who Monsieur de Pluquet tells us, was also in the great battle, must have been well advanced in years in 1066.

Whatever his services, it was not till after Hugh d'Avranches was created Earl of Chester, in 1071, that Henry de Ferrers received at least the Castle of Tutbury, his "caput Baronie," which had been previously granted to the said Hugh, and resigned by him on becoming Earl of Chester. In 1085, we find him appointed one of the commissioners for the general survey of the kingdom, and in that year he is recorded as the holder, besides the Castle of Tutbury, of seven lordships in Staffordshire, twenty in Berkshire, three in Wiltshire, five in Essex, seven in Oxfordshire, two in Lincolnshire, two in Buckinghamshire, one in Gloucestershire, two in Herefordshire, three in Hampshire, thirty-five in Leicestershire, six in Warwickshire, three in Nottinghamshire, and one hundred and fourteen in Derbyshire! When bestowed, however, or how obtained, whether wholly by grant of the King, or partly by marriage, is not recorded. Neither have we succeeded in identifying his wife, Berta, in conjunction with whom he founded and richly endowed the Priory of Tutbury in 1089, "by the concession and authority of William the younger (Rufus), King of the English." The date of his death also is unknown; but he had issue three sons, Enguenulf, William, and Robert. The two eldest died in his lifetime without issue, and Robert, who succeeded him, was the first Earl of Ferrers, not Earl Ferrers, as incorrectly described, by some, but "Robertus, Comes de Ferrarius" or "de Ferriers," as in the charter of the second Earl Robert, who was also Earl of Nottingham, and according to Orderic Vital, the first Earl of Derby.

It is no part of the plan of this work to enter into details respecting the descendants of the actual companions of the Conqueror, but there are exceptions to most, if not to all, rules, and there is so little to be said about Henry de Ferrers, and so much about his immediate successors, that I am tempted to depart from my own rule on this occasion.

There is considerable difference of opinion, in the absence of indubitable facts, as to which of these two Roberts - father and son - distinguished himself in the famous battle at Northallerton, known as the Battle of the Standard, also as to the exact period at which the earldoms of Nottingham and Derby were conferred upon an Earl of Ferrers; but the principal bone of contention is the identification of the fortunate member of that family who married Margaret, daughter and heiress of William Peverel, Lord of Nottingham, who was dispossessed of his estates by King Henry II, for conspiring with Maud, Countess of Chester, to poison her husband, Ranulph Gernons, Earl of Chester, in 1155.

Now this is a very curious story, which has been received in perfect confidence, and handed down from writer to writer, as a portion of the history of England, until, at the Newark Congress of the British Archaeological Association, I ventured to question the very existence even of the Margaret Peverel, who has been married by various genealogists to at least three successive Earls of Ferrers.

In the charter of King Stephen to the monks of Lanton we find mention of this William Peverel, of his wife Oddona, and his son Henry, at that time most probably his heir apparent; but there is no notice of any daughter, and the rolls of the reign of Henry 1, Stephen, and Henry II, in which mention is made of many Peverels, including the mother and sister of William Peverel of Nottingham, are equally silent on the score of a daughter, and acknowledge no Margaret Peverel of any branch.

Vincent gives Margaret to the first Earl William, who tells us himself that his wife's name was Sibilla; others to William's father, the second Robert, who explicitly declares that his wife was another Sibilla, daughter of William, Lord Braose of Bramber; and my dear lamented friend, the late Rev. C. Hartshorne, in the "Archæological Journal" (vol. v., p. 129), calls Margaret the wife of the first Robert, who married Hawise de Vitry.

For the proof that William was the happy man we are referred to the Oblate Boll of the 1st of John, in which it is said that William, the third earl of that name, calls Margaret his grandmother. Now here is the entry referred to, in which you will find no such thing: - "The Earl of Ferrers gives two thousand marks for Hecham, Blidsworth, and Newbottle, that the King may forego all claim to other lands which were William Peverel's, and the King gives to him the park of Hecham, which the Lord Henry, his great-grandfather (that is, King Henry II) gave in exchange to the ancestors of William Peverel," Where is Margaret? Where any mention of the grandmother of the Earl of Ferrers?

The next reference is to a plea-roll of the 25th of Henry III, which certainly proves that some Earl of Ferrers assumed a right of heirship to William Peverel, but by no means hints that it was in right of his wife, or makes any mention of Margaret. The words are remarkable. The Earl of Ferrers is therein stated to have made himself heir of the aforesaid William Peverel, and to have intruded himself into the same inheritance during the war between the King and his barons. Now, we are told that one of the earliest acts of Henry II in the year after his accession, viz., 1155, was to disinherit William Peverel, the staunch supporter of his old rival Stephen, upon the opportune charge of poisoning the Earl of Chester, as before mentioned. Henry himself does not charge him specifically with it, but the cause is distinctly stated by the Chronicon Roffense, the register of Dunstable, Matthew Paris, Matthew of Westminster, and Gervase of Dover, a goodly array of highly respectable authorities.
But how are we to reconcile this statement with the fact that Henry, before he ascended the throne, most probably at the time of the pacification with Stephen in 1152, and certainly not later than 1153, in which year Earl Eanulph died, gave to this very Ranulph the man Peverel is accused of poisoning, with other large estates of hostile nobles, the castle and town of Nottingham, and the whole fee of William Peverel, wherever it was (with the exception of Hecham) unless he (William Peverel) could acquit and clear himself of his wickedness and treason? Are we not justified in believing, upon the evidence of this agreement - for such is the nature of the instrument, which is witnessed by parties both for Henry and Ranulph, - that Peverel was dispossessed of his estates, not for assisting to poison the Earl of Chester, for to that very Earl the estates are given, but for wickedness and treason generally - in plain words, for supporting Stephen manfully and faithfully against Henry and his mother.

Such was evidently the opinion of Sir Peter Leycester, who printed this important document at length in his "Prolegomena," prefaced with these words, "How Randal Earl of Chester was rewarded for taking part with Henry Fitz-Empress, being yet but Duke of Normandy and Earl of Anjou, may appear by this deed following." No hint of its being a compensation to him for injury inflicted by Peverel.

And what was the punishment of the Countess Maud, the supposed accomplice of Peverel, and if so, the most culpable of the twain? She survived the Earl her husband many years, and her name is associated with that of her son, Hugh Kevilioc, in several acts of benevolence and piety, amongst them actually the purchase of absolution for her husband, who died excommunicated.

Hugh Kevilioc, who succeeded to his father's earldom with all his possessions, had a daughter named Agnes, who became the wife of William, second of that name, Earl of Ferrers and Derby, and thus it is clearly evident how that Earl made himself heir of Peverel and intruded himself into that inheritance, having purchased Hecham of the King, which had been excepted from the rest of the fee of Peverel in the grant of Henry Duke of Normandy to Ranulph Gernons, and claiming heirship to the estates of Peverel, in right of his wife Agnes, sister and co-heir of Ranulph Blondeville, Earl of Chester, the grandson of the grantee, and not through any marriage with this phantom Margaret Peverel, no trace of whom has ever been found in one authentic document.

The reputed victim of Peverel's machinations is said by King, in his "Vale Royal," to have died after lingering in agonies, which I suspect to be an absurd translation of the "post multos agones" of Gervase of Dover. His words are, "post multos agones militaris gloriæ," and the context proves that the words do not apply to bodily torture, but to struggles or contests as a soldier in pursuit of military glory. (Vide Ducange sub agonia and agonizare.) What conclusive proof have we that Ranulph, Earl of Chester died of poison at all? "Ut fama fuit" is all Gervase of Dover can say about it.
19080717 F ii Isabel de Ferrers was born about 1036.

38161436. Iorwerth Drwyndwn ap Owain was born about 1130 in Gwynned, Wales. He died 1184. Iorwerth married Margaret verch Madog.

38161437. Margaret verch Madog was born about 1129 in Overton-Madog, Flintshire, Wales. [Parents]

They had the following children:

19080718 M i Llywelyn I "Fawr" ap Lorwerth was born about 1173 and died 11 Apr 1240.

38161442. Ingelram (Ingram) de Baillol was born 1167 in Harcourt, Eure, Normandy, France. He died 1244 in Tours-en-Vimeu, Pickardy, France. Ingelram married Agnes de Berkeley about 1195 in Gartley, Banffshire, Scotland.

38161443. Agnes de Berkeley was born 1185 in Gartley, Banffshire, Scotland. [Parents]

They had the following children:

19080721 F i Eleanor de Baillol was born 1200.

38161444. William de Warenne 6th Earl of Surrey 1 was born 1166 in Surrey, England. He died 2 27 May 1240 in London, Middlesex, England. William married 1 Maud Marshal before 13 Oct 1225. [Parents]

William de Warren (Plantagenet), Earl of Warren and Surrey, sided at the commencement of the contest between King John and the barons and for a long time thereafter with his royal kinsman, but eventually joined the banner of Lewis of France. On the death of King John, however, he returned to his allegiance and swore fealty to King Henry III, at the solemn nuptials of which monarch he had the honor of serving the king, at the banquet, with his royal cup in the Earl of Arundel's stead, who, being in minority, could not perform that office as he had not be engirt with the sword of knighthood. His lordship m. 1st, Lady Maud de Albini, dau. of the Earl of Arundel, but by her ladyship had no issue. Hem. 2ndly, Maud, dau., of William Marshal, Earl of Pembroke, and widow of Hugh Bigot, Earl of Norfolk, by whom he had John, his successor, and Isabel. He d. in 1240, and was s. by his son, John de Warren (Plantagenet), Earl of Warren and Surrey. [Sir Bernard Burke, Dormant, Abeyant, Forfeited, and Extinct Peerages, Burke's Peerage, Ltd., London, 1883, p. 569, Warren, Earls of Surrey]

38161445. Maud Marshal 1, 2 was born about 1192 in Pembroke, Pembroke, Wales. She died 3 27 Mar 1248 and was buried in Tintern Abbey, Chapel Hill, Monmouthsire, England. [Parents]

Maud Marshal m. 1st to Hugh Bigod, Earl of Norfolk; 2ndly, to William de Warren, Earl of Surrey; and 3rdly, to Walde de Dunstanville. This lady, upon the decease of her youngest brother, Anselm, Earl of Pembroke, s.p., in 1245, and the division of the estates, obtained as her share the manor of Hempsted-Marshall, in Berks, with the office of marshal of England, which was inherited by her son Roger Bigod, 4th Earl of Norfolk, and surrendered to the crown by her grandson, Rogert Bigod, 5th Earl of Norfolk. Maud, Countess of Norfolk, had likewise the manors of Chepstowand Carlogh. [Sir Bernard Burke, Dormant, Abeyant, Forfeited, and Extinct Peerages, Burke's Peerage, Ltd., London, 1883, p. 358, Marshal, Earls of Pembroke]

They had the following children:

F i
Isabel de Warren was born 1206/1228. She died 1282.
19080722 M ii John de Warenne 7th Earl of Surrey was born after Jul 1231 and died after Sep 1304.

38161446. Hugh X de Lusignan was born before 1169 in Lusignan, Vienne, France. He married Isabella Taillefer of Angouleme about 1219. [Parents]

38161447. Isabella Taillefer of Angouleme was born 1188 in Angouleme, Aquitaine, France. She died 31 May 1246 in Fontevraud, Anjou, France and was buried in Worcester Cathedral. [Parents]

They had the following children:

19080723 F i Alice de Lusignan was born about 1224 and died 9 Feb 1254/1255.

38161456. Lord Roger I de Clifford 1 was born 1190 in Clifford's Castle, Herefordshire, England. He died 1 1231 in Tenbury, Worcestershire, England. Roger married 2 Sibyl d'Ewyas after 1214. [Parents]

38161457. Sibyl d'Ewyas 1 was born about 1165 in Ewyas Harold, Herefordshire, England. She died 1236 in Ewyas Harold, Herefordshire, England. [Parents]

They had the following children:

19080728 M i Lord Roger II de Clifford Justice of Wales was born about 1215 and died 6 Nov 1285.

38161458. John Botterell was born 1197 in Tenbury, Worcestershire, England.

He had the following children:

19080729 F i Hawise de Botterell Countess of Lorraine was born 1225 and died 1301.

38161460. John de Vipont Lord of Appleby 1, 2 was born 2 1210 in Brougham Castle, Appleby, Westmorland, England. He died 1 1241. John married Sibyl de Ferrers. [Parents]

38161461. Sibyl de Ferrers 1 was born 25 Jul 1216 in Ferrers, Derbyshire, England. She died 1247. [Parents]

They had the following children:

19080730 M i Robert de Vipont Lord of Appleby Sheriff of Westmorland was born 1239 and died 7 Jun 1264.

38161462. Sir John FitzGeoffrey Sheriff of Yorkshire, Justiciar of Ireland 1 was born 1208 in of Shere, Surrey, England. He died 1 23 Nov 1258 in Farmbridge, Essex, England. John married 1 Isabell (Isabella) Bigod about 1229. [Parents]

http://www.rootsweb.com/~irlkik/history/kells.htm

Geoffrey FitzRobert died in 1211, being held hostage on behalf of his Lord [Marshall] at Hereford Castle in England. As a result some of Geoffrey's lands were seized. Geoffrey is often confused with Geoffrey de Mareis [Marisco] who was Justiciar of Ireland for various terms between 1215 and 1228. The sons of Geoffrey included William and John, who were noted providing charters to the townspeople of Kells. After William died about 1234, he was succeeded in the lands at Kells by his brother, John FitzGeoffrey, who in 1243 is described as lord of Kells. In that year John granted to William Coterel and his heirs the land of Kilmenege (Kilmaganny) in free socage. In the 1247 feodary John held the 1 1/2 knights' fees in Kenles (Kells). In the 1317 partition of the "Share of Hugh le Despenser and Alianora his wife" these fees (of Kells and Dunnamaggan) were held by the heir of John son of Geoffrey. t John FitzGeoffrey had two sons, William FitzJohn and Geoffrey FitzJohn. William, the elder, died at Dublin in custody of the Justiciar, sometime between 1250 and 1256, relinquishing his inheritance to his younger brother Geoffrey FitzJohn. Geoffrey FitzJohn in turn had a son named John who confirmed the gifts to Kells monastery of his ancestors by charter dated 1286. Another charter of his to Kells is dated 1292. John [FitzGeoffrey] died sometime around 1305 for his heir William [FitzJohn] for that year the lands in Kells were held of the heir of John, son of Geoffrey, lord of Kenles, under age and in custody of the Earl of Gloucester (Cal. Just. Rolls, ii, 96). In 1308 William [FitzJohn] is quitted claim to Geoffrey Coterel of his rights in premises in Donimegan (Dunnamaggan), including the water courses and exits of the mill where formerly stood the mill of Nesta de Davy his grandmother (Ormond Deeds), who appears therefore to have been the wife of Geoffrey FitzJohn. In 1317 William, the heir of John, is cited holding the knights fees of Kells in the feodary recorded that year, which included Kenles and Donymegan (Dunnamaggin). The family presumably died out shortly after this, for Kells is soon found in the possession of the le Pores. g to the Ormond Deeds (Vol. 1, Curtis, 1933), John fitz Geoffrey is mentioned as lord of Kells in a grant to William Coterel and his heirs for ever Kilmegene [Kilmoganny] in free socage. This grant included the mountain and wood, extending in length from the cave of Letter, and from Corballyup to the water of Gortneslie; and in breadth from Karreenemo [Garrandynas, part of the town land of Rossenara] up to the water that runs between Kilmegene and Avene [Rossenara, anciently known as Owny];paying a mark of silver yearly. In a note by Curtis he cites Lettercorbally appearing in ancient documents as an alias for Castlehale, now the town land of Rossenara demesne, in the parish of Kilmoganny.

38161463. Isabell (Isabella) Bigod 1, 2 was born about 1210 in Thetford, Norfolk, England. She died 23 Nov 1258. [Parents]

DEATH: I can't find a source for this. Many people have her dying in 1239, but also have her children born after that.

They had the following children:

19080731 F i Isabel FitzJohn was born about 1230.
F ii
Avelina FitzJohn 1 was born about 1232 in Shere, Surrey, England. She died about 20 May 1274.
F iii
Maud FitzJohn 1 was born about 1237 in Shere, Surrey, England. She died 1, 2 about 18 Apr 1301 in Grey Friars, Worcestershire, England and was buried 1 7 May 1301 in Grey Friars, Worcestershire, England.
F iv
Joan FitzJohn 1 was born about 1242 in of Shere, Surrey, England. She died 1 4 Apr 1303.

38161464. Gilbert de Clare 3rd Earl of Hertford and Gloucester 1 was born 2 about 1180 in Hertford, Hertfordshire, England. He died 2 25 Oct 1230 in Penrose, Brittany, France and was buried 10 Nov 1230 in Tewksbury, Gloucestershire, England. Gilbert married 1 Isabel Marshal on 9 Oct 1214 in Tewkesbury Abbey, Gloucestershire, England. [Parents]

Gilbert de Clare, 5th Earl of Hertford, who, after the decease of Geoffrey de Mandeville, Earl of Essex, the 2nd wife of Isabel, the divorced wife of King John, and in her right Earl of Gloucester, and her own decease, s.p., as also the decease of Almarick D'Evereux, son of the Earl of Evereux by Mabell, the other co-heiress, who likewise succeeded to the Earldom of Gloucester, became Earl of Gloucester, in right of his mother, Amicia, the other co-heiress. This nobleman was amongst the principal barons who took up arms against King John, and was appointed one of the twenty-five chosen to enforce the observance of Magna Carta. In the ensuing reign, still opposing the arbitrary proceedings of the crown, he fought on the side of the barons at Lincoln, and was taken prisoner there by William Marshall, Earl of Pembroke; but he soon afterwards made his peace. His lordship m. Isabel (who m. after his decease, Richard, Earl of Cornwall, brother of King Henry III), one of the daus., and eventually co-heiress of William Mareschal, Earl of Pembroke, by whom he had issue, Richard, his successor; William; Amicia, m. to Baldwin de Redvers, 4th Earl of Devon; Agnes; Isabel, m. to Robert de Brus. The earl d. in 1229 and was s. by his eldest son, Richard de Clare. [Sir Bernard Burke, Dormant and Extinct Peerages, Burke's Peerage, London, 1883, p. 119, Clare, Lords of Clare, Earls of Hertford, Earls of Gloucester]

38161465. Isabel Marshal 1 was born 9 Oct 1200 in Pembroke, Pembrokeshire, Wales. She died 2 17 Jan 1239/1240 in Birkhampstead, Hertfordshire, England and was buried in Beaulieu, Southampton, England. [Parents]

They had the following children:

F i
Agnes de Clare was born 1224 in Tewksbury, Gloucestershire, England. She died 26 Dec 1261.
F ii
Amicia de Clare was born 1220. She died 1283.
19080732 M iii Richard de Clare Earl of Hertford and Gloucester was born 4 Aug 1222 and died 15 Jul 1262.
F iv
Isobel de Clare 1 was born 1 2 Nov 1226 in Tewksbury, Gloucestershire, England. She died after 10 Jul 1264 in Cleveland, Yorkshire, Scotland.
M v
William de Clare was born 1228. He died 1258.
M vi
Gilbert de Clare was born 1229. He died 1230/1319.

38161466. John de Lacy Earl of Lincoln 1 was born 2 about 1192 in Lincoln, Lincolnshire, England. He died 2 22 Jul 1240 in Stanlaw, Cheshire, England. John married Margaret de Quincy on 1256/1265. [Parents]

John de Lacy, Constable of Chester, in the 15th year of King John, undertook the payment of 7,000 marks to the crown in the space of four years for the livery of the lands of his inheritance and to be discharged of all his father's debts due to the exchequer; further obliging himself by oath that, in case he should ever swerve from his allegiance and adhere to the king's enemies, all his possessions should devolve upon the crown; promising also that he would not marry without the king's license. By this agreement it was arranged that the king should retain the castles of Pontefract and Dunnington, still in his own hands; and that he, the said John, should allow 40 pounds per annum for the custody of those fortresses. But the next year he had Dunnington restored to him upon hostages. About this period he joined the baronial standard and was one of the celebrated twenty-five barons appointed to enforce the observance of Magna Carta. But the next year he obtained letters of safe conduct to come to the king to make his peace, and he had similar letters upon the accession of Henry III, in the 2nd year of which monarch's reign he went with divers other noblemen into the Holy Land. He m. Margaret, dau. and heir of Robert de Quincy, Earl of Winchester, by Hawyse, 4th sister and co-heir of Ranulph de Meschines, Earl of Chester and Lincoln, which Ranulph, by a formal charter under his seal, granted the Earldom of Lincoln, that is, so much as he could grant thereof, to the said Hawyse, "to the end that she might be countess and that her heirs might also enjoy the earldom;" which grant was confirmed by the king and, at the especial request of the countess, this John de Lacy, constable of Chester, was created by charter, dated at Northampton, 23 November, 1232, Earl of Lincoln, with remainder to the heirs of his body, by his wife, the above-named Margaret. In the contest which occurred during the same year between the king and Richard Marshal, Earl of Pembroke, Earl Marshal, Matthew Paris states that the Earl of Lincoln was brought over to the king's party with John le Scot, Earl of Chester, by Peter de Rupibus, bishop of Winchester, for a bribe of 1,000 marks. In 1237, his lordship was one of those appointed to prohibit Oto, the pope's legate, from establishing anything derogatory to the king's crown and dignity in the council of prelates then assembled; and the same year he had a grant of the sheriffalty of Cheshire, being likewise constituted governor of the castle of Chester. The earl d. in 1240, leaving Margaret, his wife, surviving, who re-m. William Marshal, Earl of Pembroke. His lordship left issue, Edmund, his successor, and two daus., which ladies in the 27th Henry III, were removed to Windsor, there to be educated with the king's own daus.; of these, Maud m. Richard de Clare, Earl of Gloucester.[Sir Bernard Burke, Dormant and Extinct Peerages, Burke's Peerage, London, 1883]

38161467. Margaret de Quincy 1 was born 1208 in Lincoln, Lincolnshire, England. She died 1 before 30 Mar 1266 in Clerkenwell, Middlesex, England and was buried in Hospitallers, Clerkenwell, Middlesex, England. [Parents]

They had the following children:

19080733 F i Maud de Lacy was born about 1223 and died before 10 Mar 1288/1289.
M ii
Edmund de Lacy Earl of Lincoln was born about May 1227 in Halton, Chestershire, England. He died 21 Jun 1258.

38161468. Maurice FitzGerald 2nd Baron of Offaly Justiciar of Ireland 1, 2 was born about 1190 in Offaly, Kildare, Ireland. He died 2, 3 1257 in Franciscan Friary, Youghal, Ireland. Maurice married Juliane de Cogan. [Parents]

Built castles in Sligo, Banada, and Ardcree

38161469. Juliane de Cogan 1, 2 was born about 1223 in Bampton, Devonshire, England. [Parents]

They had the following children:

M i
Thomas FitzGerald Baron of Offaly 1 was born 1240 in Banada, Sligo, Ireland. He died 1, 2 1271 in Ballyloughmask, Mayo, Ireland.

Founder Trinitarian Abbey at Adare, Limerick, IRE
19080734 M ii Maurice FitzMaurice Lord of Offaly Justiciar of Ireland was born about 1242 and died before 10 Nov 1286.

38161470. Stephen de Longespee Earl of Ulster Justiciar of Ireland 1 was born 1216 in Salisbury, Wiltshire, England. He died 2 23 Jan 1274/1275 in of Sutton, Northampshire, England. Stephen married 3 Emmeline de Ridelisford about 1244. [Parents]

38161471. Emmeline de Ridelisford 1 was born 1216 in Kildare, Ireland. She died 2 1276. [Parents]

They had the following children:

F i
Ela de Longespee 1, 2 was born about 1246 in Salisbury, Wiltshire, England. She died 19 Jul 1276.
19080735 F ii Emmeline Longespee was born 1250 and died 1291.

38161472. John I "Lackland" Plantagenet King of England 1 was born 2 24 Dec 1166 in Kings Manor House, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England. He died 2 19 Oct 1216 in Newark Castle, Nottinghamshire, England and was buried in Cathedral, Worcester, Worcestershire, England. John married Isabella Taillefer of Angouleme on 24 Aug 1200 in Bordeaux, Gironde, France. [Parents]

Reigned 1199-1216. Signed Magna Carta in 1215 at Runnymede.

His reign saw renewal of war with Phillip II Augustus of France to whom he has lost several continental possessions including Normandy by 1205. He came into conflict with his Barons and was forced to Sign the Magna Carta. His later repudiation of the charter led to the first barons war 1215-17 during which John died. Burke says he was born in 1160.

King of Ireland 1177, Count of Mortain 1189, Earl of Gloucester.

Matthew Paris wrote, 'Foul as it is, hell itself is defiled by the presence of King John', and this pretty well sums up John's reputation--until 1944, that is. For in that year Professor Galbraith demonstrated in a lecture to an astonished world that the chief chronicle source for the reign of John was utterly unreliable. Since then bad King John has been getting better and better, until now he is nearly well again, and a leading scholar in the field has seriously warned us that the twentieth century could well create it own John myth.

A man who can create so many myths, or rather have them created about him, is clearly outstanding in some way, but the myths hide the truth. Plainly the chroniclers who invented stories about him after his death can tell us little, and we should not take too much notice of people who condemned John for carrying out his father's (and his brother's officials') policies and administrative routines, nor indeed those who condemned him because of the bitter troubles that happened in the succeeding reign, troubles which were in no means entirely of John's making. Recent historians have turned to the administrative records of his reign, and found there a very different picture; but still the lingering doubts remain--were these records the result of John's skill and application or of those of his able staff?

John was a paunchy little man, five feet five inches tall, with erect head, staring eyes, flaring nostrils and thick lips set in a cruel pout, as his splendid monument at Worcester shows. He had the tempestuous nature of all his family, and a driving demoniac energy: Professor Barlow says that 'he prowled around his kingdom, ' which is an evocative phrase, but it would be truer to say that he raced around it. He was fastidious about his person--taking more baths than several other medieval kings put together, and owning the ultimate in luxury, for that time, a dressing-gown. He loved good food and drink, and gambled a great deal, though he usually lost--the results of his typical impatience and carelessness are recorded on his expense rolls; above all things he loved women. Some say his 'elopement' was the cause of his loss of Normandy. He was generous to the poor (for instance, he remitted to them the penalties of the forest law), and to his servants; at the least he went through the motions of being a Christian king. He was extortionate, though if one considers the terrific increase in his outgoings (a mercenary soldier cost him 200 per cent more in wages than he would have in Henry II's day) one can understand some of his actions in the field. He was deeply concerned about justice, took care to attend to court business, and listened to supplicants with sympathy; he had also an urgent desire for peace in the land, saying that his peace was to be observed 'even if we have granted it to a dog.' But for all that, he had two totally unredeeming vices; he was suspicious, and enjoyed a cloak-and-dagger atmosphere--simply he did not inspire trust in his subjects. Dr. Warren says of him with some justice that if he had lived in the twentieth century he would have adored to run a secret police.

He was born at Oxford on Christmas Eve 1167. He was oblated for a monk at the abbey of Fontevrault at the age of one year, but was back at court by the time he was six--plainly he had no vocation, but he probably picked up at this early stage his fastidiousness and his passion for books: his library followed him wherever he went. He was his father's favorite, but he turned against the old man when his chance came, as he did against Richard (who had been very generous to his brother) when the latter was in captivity in 1193. The episode was a miserable failure, but it possibly sowed the seeds of distrust for John in England, where they began to sprout luxuriantly in 1199 when Richard died and John came to the throne.

Immediately the challenge came: Philip Augustus, the wily King of France, was backing John's nephew, Prince Arthur of Brittany (son of John's elder brother Geoffrey) as a contender for the throne, and England's French possessions fell prey to civil war. John found grave difficultly in dealing with the situation for a number of reasons, but in 1202 he made the remarkable coup of capturing Arthur by force-marching his troops eighty miles in forty-eight hours; but then his prosecution of the war became listless, and he lost much sympathy by his brutal murder of Arthur whilst in a drunken rage. By 1204 Normandy was lost.

The loss of Normandy seemed to wake John up, and he now deployed his every energy in building up the coastal defenses of Britain, now faced with an enemy the other side of the Channel, instead of just more of her own territory. The navy was built up, and the army, and John poured a quarter of his annual revenue into defense. But he could not persuade the baronage to support him in a counterstroke to regain Normandy: the barons of the north country had never owned land in Normandy and did not see why they should pay to regain southerner's castles for them. These 'Northerners' as they called themselves, were a hive of discontent, and more was to be heard from them. Meanwhile, John sailed angrily about in the Channel, cursing ineffectually.

Other troubles were to come first, however. In 1205 the Archbishop of Canterbury, Hubert Walker, died, and John assumed that he would have the choice of the new archbishop. However, Pope Innocent III was no man to support secular control over church appointments, and supported the right of the monks of Canterbury to select their own archbishop. For two years the storms blew between England and Rome, then Stephen Langton was appointed. Meanwhile John had driven the monks into exile and appropriated the revenues of the archdiocese. He had fallen out also with his half-brother, Geoffrey Archbishop or York, over tax-collection, and he too fled abroad while John collected his revenues. Four bishops joined in his fight--tension was growing to the snapping point. In 1208 the Pope put an Interdict on England, which in effect meant the clergy went on strike, or, in certain cases and areas, worked to rule. John began negotiations with Innocent, but, finding that he demanded unconditional surrender, stopped them and took over all ecclesiastical properties and incomes. He did leave the clergy sufficient to live, though barely; but he still gained a large increment to his usual finances. In November 1209 the Pope took the final step of excommunicating the King, which, in that it made him an outlaw in Christendom, did far more damage than the Interdict.

John used his enlarged treasury to restore order in Scotland, Ireland and Wales, and to rebuild the old alliance with Otto IV of Germany and the Count of Flanders against Philip Augustus. He planned a two-pronged attack on France, to take place in 1212. But that year turned out an unlucky one for John, for the barons again refused to serve abroad, and the army he had was needed to put down a revolt in Wales; the Pope was threatening to demote him, and Philip Augustus was planning a massive invasion of England. John had to give in in one direction, for the pressure was much too great: he chose the Pope, and wisely so. He agreed to return to the status quo in the matter of church property and establishment, and to pay compensation; he further resigned his kingdom into the hands of the Pope, to receive it back in return for his homage and an annual tribute of 1,000 marks (a mark being two-thirds of a pound].

He had won a notable ally in Innocent III, who supported him faithfully throughout his troubles. Then his fleet, his own creation, had the good luck to find the French fleet at anchor and unprotected, destroyed it, and so made a French invasion impossible. On the crest of a wave, John determined to put his two-pronged invasion plan into action, but once more the northern barons refused to play, and he set off to punish them. Stephen Langton had arrived on the scene by now and managed to persuade John not to provoke the barons further.

In 1214 he finally managed to put his long cherished plan into action, but the two attacks were not properly coordinated; Otto was defeated at Bovines, and John was deserted by his Protein knights.

In 1215 John faced a baronage in turmoil: they could point to the failure of his expensive schemes, he ascribed his failure to their total lack of support. The situation could not be more tense. John's nervousness can be seen in his taking of the cross, a blatant attempt to reinforce his alliance with the papacy. In April the Northerners met at Stamford; they were by now a mixture of northerners and southerners--the name was now merely a nickname--but by and large they were the younger element in the kingdom, roughnecks out for a spree. They moved south and were let into London by a faction, and received the expected encouragement from Philip Augustus in the form of siege engines brought over by one Eustace, a renegade monk turned pirate.

John offered arbitration, but the barons turned it down, and while he put his faith in an appeal to Rome, Stephen Langton, in cooperation with William Marshal and other more stable and sensible barons, were working on the Northerners' demands to incorporate them into a general charter, which would not only govern feudal relationships, but would also lay down a more general pattern of legality in government. On 15 June John fixed his seal to the draft of Magna Carat, and on 19 June attested copies were sent to all parts of the kingdom.

The King did his part thoroughly, though for how long he would have continued is another matter, but the barons continued to distrust him. They remained in arms, organizing tournaments as their excuse, saying that the prize would be 'a bear a certain lady would send.' This was civil war, and John took to it with a fiendish glee. He reduced the north and the east, and was about to mop up the remainder of the opposition in London when Philip Augustus' son Louis landed in force to help the barons (May 1216). John had been riding hard for months, and was sick with dysentery after a bout of over-eating; whilst crossing the Wash, the whole of his baggage-train was lost. At Newark Castle on 18 October, he died, desiring to be buried near his patron saint Wolfsan in Worcester Cathedral.

He was by no means a good man, and his energies could well have been put to a better use, but in a different situation he might well have made a great king. His constant failure was discipline, over himself first, and others second. John reminds me of nothing so much as the type of person who is brilliant in many ways, and has many gifts, but leaves after two terms 'not suited to teaching in this type of school.' [Who's Who in the Middle Ages, John Fines, Barnes and Noble Books, New York, 1995]

38161473. Isabella Taillefer of Angouleme is printed as #38161447.

They had the following children:

19080736 M i Henry III Plantagenet King of England was born 1 Oct 1207 and died 16 Nov 1272.
M ii
Richard Plantagenet Earl of Cornwall 1 was born 5 Jan 1208/1209 in Winchester Castle, Hampshire, England. He died 2 Apr 1272 in Berkhampstead Castle, Hertfordshire, England and was buried 13 Apr 1272 in Hailes Abbey, Gloucestershire, England.

Richard was very wealthy and used it to be elected Holy Roman Emperor. His reign was not of any substance-pretty much symbolic. Late in life he gave up hope of ever actually ruling.
F iii
Joan Plantagenet was born 22 Jul 1210 in Gloucester, England. She died 2 Feb 1236/1237 in Aberconway, Caernarvonshire, Wales.

Others suggest her mother was Clemantina, the wife of Henry Pinel.
F iv
Isabella Plantagenet Empress of Germany was born 1214 in Gloucester, England. She died 1 Dec 1241 in Foggia, Naples, Italy and was buried in Andria, Sicily.
F v
Eleanor Plantagenet was born 1215 in Gloucester, England. She died 13 Apr 1275 in Montargis Abbey, France and was buried in Montargis Abbey, France.

Despite taking a vow of perpetual chastity on widowhood she married Simon de Montford!

Home First Previous Next Last

Surname List | Name Index